1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Ford | Reliant |
| Model | 12 M | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1280 mm |
