1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1964 Nissan Cedric is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 190 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | Cedric |
Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2540 mm |