1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1970 Triumph 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 1300 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | 12 M | 1300 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2460 mm |