1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1991 Nissan Presea
To start off, 1991 Nissan Presea is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Nissan Presea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Presea (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Presea should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Presea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1991 Nissan Presea | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | Presea |
Year Released | 1958 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1330 mm |