1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 626 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1400 mm |