1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1994 Mazda 323
To start off, 1994 Mazda 323 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 323 (74 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 323 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1994 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 323 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |