1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (105 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Mazda MX-3 has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 105 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2370 mm |
