1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | 12 M | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
