1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 12 M | 164 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |