1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | 626 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |
