1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Ford 12 M (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford 12 M weights approximately 215 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | 12 M | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1810 mm |
