1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda HR-V is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,672 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda HR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda HR-V (113 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda HR-V should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda HR-V weights approximately 225 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda HR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2003 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | HR-V |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1672 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2360 mm |