1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Honda Z
To start off, 2003 Honda Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Ford 12 M (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Z weights approximately 65 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 2003 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2003 Honda Z | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | Z |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2370 mm |