1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK (94 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 12 M | SLK |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1170 cc | 2297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2410 mm |