1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | eK |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1560 mm |