1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 670 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | 12 M | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2380 mm |
