1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | 12 M | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1170 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |