1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,170 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | 12 M | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1170 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1810 mm |