1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Nissan Pickup
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pickup is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pickup is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pickup (132 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pickup should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Nissan Pickup is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pickup will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 2004 Nissan Pickup | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | Pickup |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2960 mm |
