1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 290 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2800 mm |