1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2007 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2007 Honda CR-V is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda CR-V (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Honda CR-V weights approximately 797 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2007 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | CR-V |
Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |