1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2007 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2007 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Hardbody (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 2007 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 2007 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
