1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2007 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2007 Nissan Micra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,238 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Micra (64 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 12 M | 2007 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | Micra |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 1238 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2440 mm |
