1958 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1958 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1958 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | 12 M | Equator |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |