1958 Ford 17 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1958 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford 17 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Ford 17. (129 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 17 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 17 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1958 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 57 L |