1958 Ford 17 vs. 1996 Mazda Familia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Familia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford 17 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 1958 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford 17 | 1996 Mazda Familia | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 17 | Familia |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.6 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |
