1958 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Galant
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 310 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Galant.
Because 1958 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Mitsubishi Galant | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | Galant |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 1832 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1210 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2640 mm |
