1958 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 920 kg more than 1958 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Fairlane | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2440 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2550 mm |
