1958 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Honda Insight
To start off, 2003 Honda Insight is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 680 kg more than 2003 Honda Insight.
Because 1958 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Insight, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Honda Insight | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Fairlane | Insight |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2410 mm |
