1958 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 70 kg more than 1958 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1590 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2270 mm |
