1958 Ford Fairlane vs. 2011 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2011 Fiat Croma is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Croma weights approximately 205 kg more than 1958 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1958 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Fairlane | 2011 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Fairlane | Croma |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 2387 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1725 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2710 mm |
