1958 Ford Popular vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Popular would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1958 Ford Popular. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 915 kg more than 1958 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Ford Popular. (63 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Ford Popular.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford Popular | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Popular | Clio |
Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 63 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2490 mm |