1958 Ford Prefect vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1958 Ford Prefect. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford Prefect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 286 kg more than 1958 Ford Prefect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Prefect | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Prefect | Murena |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.5 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 765 kg | 1051 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2440 mm |
