1958 Ford Prefect vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1958 Ford Prefect. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford Prefect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 815 kg more than 1958 Ford Prefect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Ford Prefect. (71 Nm @ 2150 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Ford Prefect.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford Prefect | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Prefect | Sigma |
Year Released | 1958 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 765 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2730 mm |