1958 Ford Zodiac vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,550 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 1958 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Zodiac | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Zodiac | Mum 500 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2550 cc | 500 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
