1958 Ford Zodiac vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,550 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Ford Zodiac (76 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 542 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Ford Zodiac | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Zodiac | Smart |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2550 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
