1958 GAZ M20 vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 GAZ M20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 GAZ M20 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1958 GAZ M20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1958 GAZ M20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 GAZ M20 weights approximately 68 kg more than 2004 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 GAZ M20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 GAZ M20.
Compare all specifications:
1958 GAZ M20 | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | M20 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |