1958 Holden FE vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1958 Holden FE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Studebaker Commander (94 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1958 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 1958 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 478 kg more than 1958 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Holden FE | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Holden | Studebaker |
| Model | FE | Commander |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3030 mm |
