1958 Holden FE vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1966 Lotus Seven is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Holden FE (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Holden FE should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Holden FE weights approximately 548 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Holden FE | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | FE | Seven |
Year Released | 1958 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2240 mm |