1958 Holden FE vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1968 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Holden FE (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Holden FE should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1958 Holden FE.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Holden FE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Holden FE (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1958 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Holden FE | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | FE | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2060 mm |
