1958 Holden FE vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Holden FE weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1958 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Holden FE | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | FE | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |
