1958 Holden FE vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1958 Holden FE.
Because 1958 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Holden FE. (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Holden FE | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | FE | 75 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2750 mm |