1958 Holden FE vs. 2009 Volkswagen CC
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen CC is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen CC (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1958 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC should accelerate faster than 1958 Holden FE.
Because 1958 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen CC (281 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Holden FE. (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen CC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Holden FE | 2009 Volkswagen CC | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | FE | CC |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2720 mm |