1958 Holden FE vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1958 Holden FE. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1958 Holden FE.
Because 1958 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Holden FE | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | FE | Cruze |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2685 mm |