1958 Isuzu Minx vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1958 Isuzu Minx. (45 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1958 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 494 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Isuzu Minx | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lotus |
| Model | Minx | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2420 mm |
