1958 Isuzu Minx vs. 2008 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2008 Smart Roadster is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Roadster (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Isuzu Minx. 2008 Smart Roadster has automatic transmission and 1958 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1958 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Isuzu Minx | 2008 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Isuzu | Smart |
| Model | Minx | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |
