1958 Isuzu Minx vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1958 Isuzu Minx. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1958 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1958 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Isuzu Minx | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | Minx | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |
