1958 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jaguar XK (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 594 kg more than 1958 Jaguar XK.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jaguar XK (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1958 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jaguar XK | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
Model | XK | Ram |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3906 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2790 mm |