1958 Jeep CJ vs. 1987 Audi 4000
To start off, 1987 Audi 4000 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jeep CJ (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1987 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1987 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Audi 4000. 1987 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 1958 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1958 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 1987 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |
