1958 Jeep CJ vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 183 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ | Elan |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1991 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 160 HP |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 997 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2260 mm |
